RESUMO
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide, especially in people with obesity, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and metabolic syndrome. Weight loss and dietary modifications are established first-line treatments for NAFLD. Currently, there is no approved drug for NAFLD; however, pioglitazone and vitamin E have shown some beneficial effects. This systematic review covers the comparative efficacies of vitamin E, pioglitazone, and vitamin E plus pioglitazone. As of December 2022, the sources for prior literature review included PubMed, PubMed Central, and Medline. We included studies assessing the efficacy of pioglitazone, vitamin E, and vitamin E plus pioglitazone in improving liver histology, liver markers, and lipid profile when compared to other interventions in patients with NAFLD/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Review materials include randomized control trials (RCTs), traditional reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and observational studies on human participants published within the last five years in the English language. Studies on animals, pediatric populations, and with insufficient data were excluded from the review. Two authors scanned and filtered articles independently and later performed quality checks. A third reviewer resolved any conflicts. The risk of bias was assessed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines for systematic reviews, the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs, and the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles for Traditional Reviews. A total of 21 articles were shortlisted. The results showed that pioglitazone and vitamin E are effective in reducing steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning, reducing liver markers, but there seem to be conflicting data on fibrosis resolution. Pioglitazone decreases triglycerides and increases high-density lipoproteins. One study has suggested that pioglitazone has superior efficacy to vitamin E in fibrosis reduction and vitamin E plus pioglitazone has superior efficacy than pioglitazone alone for NASH resolution. However, these conclusions require further validation through extensive analysis and additional research. In conclusion, diabetic patients with NAFLD can be given pioglitazone, and non-diabetic patients with NAFLD can be given vitamin E.
RESUMO
Steroids are commonly used in children for the treatment of various medical conditions. However, systemic steroids can lead to the development of ocular hypertension (OHT), an increase in intraocular pressure. Limited literature is available on the systemic route of steroid administration in children and the development of this side effect. For literature writing and review, a thorough research was conducted across various platforms, such as PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Medline, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR). After all the screening processes and quality checks, 12 articles were finalized for review writing. The aim was to explore if OHT development is a common side effect developed in children on systemic steroid use for various medical conditions and if any particular risk factors were present among children that lead to its development. The results indicate that OHT is a common side effect of systemic steroid use in children. Children may or may not present with the symptoms of raised intraocular pressure. The development of OHT occurs within one month of the beginning of the steroid treatment in most of the reviewed studies. Several risk factors associated with developing this side effect were also found. In conclusion, systemic steroid use in children leads to the development of OHT. Awareness among healthcare professionals regarding this potential association is necessary. This information can be used to develop guidelines for serial ocular examinations in children on prolonged systemic steroid use.
RESUMO
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major global health concern, accounting for significant cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite advancements in early detection and treatment modalities, the prevention of CRC remains a critical goal. Cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) is an inducible enzyme involved in the production of pro-inflammatory prostaglandins, which play a crucial role in various cellular processes, including inflammation, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. Elevated COX-2 expression has been consistently observed in colorectal tumors, indicating their role in the pathogenesis of cancer. COX-2 inhibitors, such as celecoxib and rofecoxib, have been studied as potentially effective treatment modalities due to their ability to decrease prostaglandin levels, which are generally higher in cancer patients. Aberrant prostaglandin production is linked to the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, during which adenomas turn dysplastic and accumulate enough damage to become malignant. COX-2 inhibitors have also been shown to modulate various signaling pathways involved in CRC development, such as wingless-related integration site/ß-catenin (Wnt/ß-catenin), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and phosphoinositide-3-kinase-protein kinase B/Akt (PI3K/Akt) pathways. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the protective effects of long-term usage of COX-2 inhibitors on CRC in genetically predisposed individuals and their overall effect on the prognosis of the disease. The researchers conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and collected data from several databases, including PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The search strategy combined keywords related to CRC, COX-2 inhibitors, protective effects, and prognosis. They identified 1189 articles and shortlisted 26 full-text articles that met the eligibility criteria. Quality assessment tools, such as the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Review (AMSTAR) for systematic reviews, the Cochrane bias assessment tool for randomized control trials, the scale for the assessment of narrative review articles (SANRA) checklist for narrative reviews, and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool for cross-sectional studies and case reports, are used. This review's conclusions will assist in determining the effectiveness of COX-2 inhibitors to prevent CRC. This review may also contribute to developing guidelines for clinicians to manage genetically predisposed individuals with CRC. Furthermore, the results of this review will shed light on the potential of COX-2 inhibitors as a preventive measure against CRC in genetically predisposed individuals.
RESUMO
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurological deficit in brain functions that prevents a child from having a normal social life like his peers. It results in the inability to interact and communicate with others. Unsurprisingly, the alarming increase in screen-time exposure in children has become even more of a concern. Electronic devices are a double-edged sword. Despite their benefits, they have many potential hazards to children's neurological development. Previous studies have investigated the effects of unsupervised screen time and its impact on white matter development during the early years of life of children. The white matter has an important role in the development of neurological functions. This systematic review aims to qualitatively analyze the literature available on early screen time exposure and its association with the risk of developing ASD. This systematic review implemented the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for data in the recent six years. A total of 27,200 articles were identified using the MeSH and keywords through four selected databases. Search results revealed 70 from PubMed, 17,700 from Google Scholar, zero from Cochrane Library, and 9,430 from PubMed Central. After applying filters and screening the results by title and abstract and then by full text, 11 studies fulfilled the criteria to be included in the review. We found that the longer the period of screen exposure, the higher the risk that the child may develop ASD. Further, the earlier the child is exposed to screens, the higher the risk of developing ASD in children compared to children exposed later.
